The Power of Situation: How Lewin's Leadership Styles Dictate Human Behavior
After the data was compiled it was clear that the autocratic boys worked the hardest but typically, only when the leader was watching. The boys were much more aggressive and hostile under autocratic leadership and showed more submission to the leader acting like child fascists.
Very little work was accomplished under the laissez-faire leadership and if work was accomplished it was poorly done. The laissez-faire style of leadership, total freedom without guidance, also lead to mayhem between the children.
The democratic style ran the smoothest. The boys showed the highest levels of motivation and creativity with more mutual praise and playfulness than any other leadership style.
The experiment was best at portraying how democracy was the best leadership style to implement. However, this experiment plays a very important role in understanding social situations. The outcome of each leadership style was due to the social situation that was created and did not stem from each boy’s individual personality. The social factors and interactions were the critical part of this experiment. 1
1, 5. Discovering Psychology hosted by Philip Zimbardo “The Power of Situation” Annenberg/CPB: Annenberg Foundation-Corporation for Public Broadcasting. WGBH Boston with the American Psychological Association. <http:></http:> 2001
Thanks for reading! Please comment!
Other Related blog(s): The SocioEconomic Market, Sociology of Love



Comments
Post a Comment